<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Mock Draft 101 - Mock Draft 101</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mockdraft101.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mockdraft101.com</link>
	<description>Mock Draft,Player Scouting, and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 02:08:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Miami Heat by Bobby</title>
		<link>http://mockdraft101.com/nba/miami-heat#comment-3903</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 02:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mockdraft101.com/?page_id=7171#comment-3903</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I believe that the Heat should be looking at the following players at the point they are at in the draft (#1=best)!
#1 Andrew Nicholson
#2 Fab Melo
#3 Tyshawn Taylor
#4 Trade down, get more picks!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that the Heat should be looking at the following players at the point they are at in the draft (#1=best)!<br />
#1 Andrew Nicholson<br />
#2 Fab Melo<br />
#3 Tyshawn Taylor<br />
#4 Trade down, get more picks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Round 7 by mockdraft</title>
		<link>http://mockdraft101.com/mock-draft/round7#comment-2559</link>
		<dc:creator>mockdraft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 02:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mockdraft101.com/?page_id=8620#comment-2559</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank You. Falcons are tough to get a read on. I think TE is addressed within their first few picks, but like you said TE in round #2 seems like a bit of a luxury. DE and O-line depth should be their main priorities in my opinion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank You. Falcons are tough to get a read on. I think TE is addressed within their first few picks, but like you said TE in round #2 seems like a bit of a luxury. DE and O-line depth should be their main priorities in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Round 7 by Jeff</title>
		<link>http://mockdraft101.com/mock-draft/round7#comment-2481</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 18:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mockdraft101.com/?page_id=8620#comment-2481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I normally don&#039;t like the idea of Atlanta taking a TE in the second round... but as I read the rest of your picks for the team, the mock turned out really well for them. TE so early was a bit of a luxury pick, but the needs were attacked rapdily thereafter with a DE, multiple OL picks and even safety depth. Well done!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I normally don&#8217;t like the idea of Atlanta taking a TE in the second round&#8230; but as I read the rest of your picks for the team, the mock turned out really well for them. TE so early was a bit of a luxury pick, but the needs were attacked rapdily thereafter with a DE, multiple OL picks and even safety depth. Well done!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NBA Mock Draft by Matt</title>
		<link>http://mockdraft101.com/nba/nba-mock-draft#comment-2328</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 00:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mockdraft101.com/?page_id=7548#comment-2328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Reaptors drafting Beal will not fill a huge hole at SG; Demar Derozan]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Reaptors drafting Beal will not fill a huge hole at SG; Demar Derozan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NBA Mock Draft by Dave43'</title>
		<link>http://mockdraft101.com/nba/nba-mock-draft#comment-2315</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave43'</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 15:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mockdraft101.com/?page_id=7548#comment-2315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SG is a major concern for the Sixers?  Evan Turner, Lou Williams, Adre Iguodala (a SG playing SF) and Jodie Meeks aren&#039;t enough?  I think the Sixers need a PF more with Brand getting old and Hawes being a free agent.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SG is a major concern for the Sixers?  Evan Turner, Lou Williams, Adre Iguodala (a SG playing SF) and Jodie Meeks aren&#8217;t enough?  I think the Sixers need a PF more with Brand getting old and Hawes being a free agent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NBA Mock Draft by Mike</title>
		<link>http://mockdraft101.com/nba/nba-mock-draft#comment-2241</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2012 20:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mockdraft101.com/?page_id=7548#comment-2241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Cavs have 2 first rounders. There&#039;s and the Lakers. You only have them with one pick, which is the Lakers not their lottery pick.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Cavs have 2 first rounders. There&#8217;s and the Lakers. You only have them with one pick, which is the Lakers not their lottery pick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Round 7 by mockdraft</title>
		<link>http://mockdraft101.com/mock-draft/round7#comment-2221</link>
		<dc:creator>mockdraft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2012 02:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mockdraft101.com/?page_id=8620#comment-2221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have him going in the 6th to Jacksonville, but I could see hid ceiling being Late 3rd-4th. Improved alot this offseason.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have him going in the 6th to Jacksonville, but I could see hid ceiling being Late 3rd-4th. Improved alot this offseason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Round 7 by CSN</title>
		<link>http://mockdraft101.com/mock-draft/round7#comment-2220</link>
		<dc:creator>CSN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2012 02:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mockdraft101.com/?page_id=8620#comment-2220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe I missed it, but if I didn&#039;t, do you have Nigel Bradham, LB, Florida St. going undrafted?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe I missed it, but if I didn&#8217;t, do you have Nigel Bradham, LB, Florida St. going undrafted?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mock Draft by Alex</title>
		<link>http://mockdraft101.com/mock-draft#comment-2218</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2012 00:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mockdraft101.com/?page_id=14#comment-2218</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cleveland is spending one of their first 3 picks on WRs, they wont wait until the 5th Round.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cleveland is spending one of their first 3 picks on WRs, they wont wait until the 5th Round.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mock Draft: Picks 17-32 by mockdraft</title>
		<link>http://mockdraft101.com/mock-draft/mock-draft-picks-17-32#comment-2179</link>
		<dc:creator>mockdraft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 20:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mockdraft101.com/?page_id=3154#comment-2179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think in the case of Adams vs. Martin you need to look at which OT could become a franchise LT. I think Martin is strickily a RT while Adams is still developing as prospect and has the skill set to become a LT. As far as Adams vs Floyd, I went back and forth on those two, but ultimately went with Adams seeing that OT is a greater need than WR. But I wouldn&#039;t be shocked if WR was the selection, nor could you blame them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think in the case of Adams vs. Martin you need to look at which OT could become a franchise LT. I think Martin is strickily a RT while Adams is still developing as prospect and has the skill set to become a LT. As far as Adams vs Floyd, I went back and forth on those two, but ultimately went with Adams seeing that OT is a greater need than WR. But I wouldn&#8217;t be shocked if WR was the selection, nor could you blame them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
